Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme
نویسنده
چکیده
Connectionism has been attacked on the grounds that it does not employ compo-sitionally structured representations (e.g., Fodor 8 Pylyshyn, 1988). This article develops the response that Connectionist models can, and in fact sometimes do, employ compositionally structured representations without, thereby. simply implementing a Classical " Language of Thought. " Focusing on the mode of combination employed in constructing representations, it distinguishes concotenative compositionality, essential to the Classical approach. from a merely functional counterpart increasingly common in Connectionist research. On the basis of this distinction it is possible to demonstrate that Connectionist representations can be compositional without being Classical. and further, that Fodor and Pylyshyn's supposedly conclusive arguments in fovor of the Classical approach do not in fact support that approach over the Connectionist alternative (as opposed lo an " osso-ciotionist " straw man). Must mental representations be structured objects? If so, in what sense? These very general questions, never far below the surface in both the theory and practice of cognitive science, have arisen once again in the guise of a clash between defenders of mainstream symbolic or " Classical " orthodoxy, and advocates of the rival Connectionist approach to the modeling of cogni-tion. Classicalists, such as Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988), have argued that the explanation of cognition requires representations iith a combinatorial syntax and semantics; Connectionism is doomed, it is claimed, unless it finds a way to implement such representations. Smolensky, meanwhile, has proposed a formidable defense: Connectionist representations can be composi-tional without being strictly combinatorial in the Classical sense, and on this basis Connectionism can account for cognition without needing to implement a " Language of Thought " (Smolensky, 1987b, 1988). There is at least one basic point of agreement among the various parties: In order to exhibit any reasonably sophisticated cognitive functions, a system This article was much improved in light of the numerous thoughtful comments from the reviewers for Cognitive Science.
منابع مشابه
Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity
Systematicity is a pervasive property of cognitive behaviour (e.g., language and reasoning) whereby the ability to represent (systematicity of representation) and infer from (systematicity of inference) some instances of a structured object extends to other instances conforming to the same structure (Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988; Fodor & McLaughlin, 1990). The problem of systematicity for a Connectio...
متن کاملConnectionism and the Issues of Compositionality and Systematicity
Connectionism as a model of the mind has been attacked by the advocators of the classical paradigm, who claim that Connectionism can only work if it is an implementation of Classical representations. This could be true for some of the models that claim to be Connectionist, but it will in this paper be shown that this is not true for Connectionist architectures that use non-symbolic representati...
متن کاملHow to Solve the Problem of Compositionality by Oscillatory Networks
Cognitive systems are regarded to be compositional: The semantic values of complex representations are determined by, and dependent on, the semantic values of primitive representations. Both classical and connectionist networks fail to model compositionality in a plausible way. The paper introduces oscillatory networks as a third alternative. It provides neurobiological evidence for the adequac...
متن کاملConnectionism the Miracle Mind Model
Connectionism as a model of the mind has recently been challenging the Classical model, in which the mind is regarded as symbol manipulating system. The main arguments against Connectionism concern its inability to form mental representations for complex expressions, which can be used for structure sensitive operations. Some argue for hybrid models which combine some of the most attractive feat...
متن کاملContext-free versus context-dependent constituency relations: A false dichotomy
In this paper I articulate a notion of constituency orthogonal both to classical and connectionist approaches. I shall consider three “structure-in-time” connectionist networks (Simple Recurrent Networks, Long Short-Term Memory Models, and Non-classical Connectionist Parsers). I shall argue that explaining compositionality by means of any of these models drives us to an information-processing b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive Science
دوره 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1990